freeman “Robert-Arthur Menard” had an application dismissed by the BC supreme court.

here’s how to look it up on a legal database.
- search “canlii” and click on the main site
- click english
- in “full text” paste “United States of America v. Emery”
- click the first result that comes up.

voila! this is called “proof”. freeman types seem short on it, typically.

same for crazy4canada ?

is this a GIYUS Megaphone artifact ?

in the application, you identified yourself as a “Freeman-on-the-Land. ” you claimed that “The Elizabeth Anne Elaine Society” was concerned with the way court proceedings were instigated, conducted and that the requirement of clear and informed consent was not being properly procured.

i assumed this was a freeman argument. how was it not?

more importantly, why didn’t you use a freeman argument? you certainly promote them heavily.